Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review is political science's premier scholarly research journal on Indonesian politics, providing peer-reviewed articles and review essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered: local politics, ethics and politics, public policy, and others. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review has published continuously since 2016 with registered number ISSN 2477-8060 (print), ISSN 2503-4456 (online). Published by Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang in cooperation with The Indonesian Inter-University Association for Political Science (APSIPOL).
Articles
14 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics"
:
14 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Hard and Soft Border Paradigm for Border Governance in Indonesia: A General Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Ulfa, Nadlirotul]]>;
<![CDATA[Fimmastuti, Desiana Rizka]]>;
<![CDATA[Nia Rahmah, Anisa Nur]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (122.187 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.9396
<![CDATA[This study focuses on border governance paradigm for various relevant policies in Indonesia. By applying literature review method, it reveals that Indonesian border governance paradigm has shifted from hard to soft border paradigm. The change has significant impact on how managing border areas in the country. In fact, both paradigms have their own advantages and limitations. This study also shows that the preference between hard or soft boarder paradigm influences the decisions on how the government understand the complexity of the border.]]>
<![CDATA[Debate over Islamic Symbolism and Substantialism in the Formulation of Local Regulation in Tasikmalaya Municipality ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuliawati, Fitriyani]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurohman, Taufik]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (213.282 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.10758
<![CDATA[This study aims to reveal debate over the formulation of local regulation. Particularly, it seeks to know political dynamics at the grassroot level in policy-making. Theoretical assumption mentions that policy-making is not only a process of government technocracy, but it can also a debate over current discourse among citizens. The qualitative study discloses that the political debate over this discourse occurs due to contradictory perspectives on the aspirations of Sharia law as a part of formal institutions in the state. The first camp argued that Islam should exist in the public as an effort to build an ideal society. Islam must be included as part of the state, at least in local regulation. In contrast, the second camp argued that in building the ideal society, state does not need to include Islam as part of the state in the regulation.]]>
<![CDATA[Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Abd. Hamid, Husen Wijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (204.503 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.10604
<![CDATA[This study focuses on deliberative democracy practices in Caturtunggal village, specifically in the sub-village (dusun) of Seturan, Karangwuni, and Ambarukmo. The study assesses the quality of deliberation in these dusun by applying the three out of five indicators of deliberative democracy theory by Fishkin (2009), namely information, subtantantive balance, and equal consideration. This study deploys qualitative descriptive method and case-study approach with in-depth interview as the main data gathering technique. This deliberation has putVillage Consultative Board (BPD) period of 2013-2019 as a mediator and to consider arguments and deliberative results. Based on the indicators which proposed by Fishkin, Seturan and Ambarukmo are categorized for having semi-ideal deliberation, meanwhile Karangwuni is categorized as not ideal. The study also finds elite capture practices in Seturan and Karangwuni, but they do not impact significantly.]]>
<![CDATA[Reckoning Informal Politics: Expands the Logic of Survival and Failure of Regional Heads ]]>
<![CDATA[Sobari, Wawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (255.071 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.12522
<![CDATA[The qualitative research addresses the political logic of why and how the incumbents succeed and fail in direct election for regional heads (pilkada) in emerging democratic Indonesia. De Mesquita et al. (2003) believe that, to survive in office, a leader needs to offer a benefit at least equal to the greatest possible benefit offered by a potential challenger. Particular to the pilkada cases in Indonesia, Erb and Sulistiyanto (2009) elaborate several factors connected to reward and punishment logic that may lead to the incumbents survival and failure in re-election bids. This study expands the logic by revealing that populism, rivalry, and tangibility are the core strategies for the successful incumbents in retaining their offices in four rural and urban regions in East Java. Particularly, the survival of an incumbent hinges on his capacity to manage rivalry risks, namely the capability to manage support and opposition both from formal and informal actors through fair or unfair means. These strategies, then, foster the success of patronage-based winning tactics to retain public office in the pilkada. To better assessment, it calls for the importance of democratic accountability as a complementary perspective (to consolidology) in measuring the progress of democracy in the country.]]>
<![CDATA[Domestic Worker, Transnational Advocacy and the State of Exception: A Case Study on The Advocacy of Domestic Workers Rights in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Bastari, Gema Ramadhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (102.855 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.11024
<![CDATA[This paper explains why domestic workers (PRT) remain not considered as formal workers in Indonesia. This problem becomes very urgent as PRT covers 76% of the national labor population and there has been considerable pressure from transnational community. This question is answered by applying Agamben's theory of state of exception. This paper deploysdiscourse analysis method to examine a number of texts related to the Government of Indonesian's stance and the advocacy for PRTs rights in Indonesia. This study finds that the Government of Indonesia has established a state of exception allowing to ignore PRTs rights as workers under existing law. The study, then, concludes that the Government of Indonesian cannot be expected to meet PRTs rights. Consequently, the strategy of advocacy should be directed to encourage other countries to push Indonesia so as to meet PRTs rights.]]>
<![CDATA[Notes from the Editors ]]>
<![CDATA[Team, Editorial]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (115.017 KB)
<![CDATA[Mainstreaming Regional Budget (APBD): Issues and Challenges in Riau Province in 2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Yandra, Alexsander]]>;
<![CDATA[Nasution, Sri Roserdevi]]>;
<![CDATA[Harsini, Harsini]]>;
<![CDATA[Wekke, Ismail Suardi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (324.67 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.11510
<![CDATA[This research explores issues related to mainstreaming the 2015 Regional Budget (APBD) of Riau Province amounted IDR 10.7 trillion. Based on the data obtained from the Riau Finance and Asset Management Board (BPKAD), Riau could only spend APBD 37.58% of APBD until October 2015. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia calculated Riau spent only 59.6% throughout 2015 and it wast the lowest regional spending in Indonesia. This poor expenditure rate demonstrates a problem in the implementation of Riaus APBD which was inneficient and not yet relevant. An assessment by government expenditure theory reveals that these problems indicate a gap in APBD allocation that affect on the non-performance regional development as targeted in mid-term regional development plan (RPJMD). This APBD seems to perform only a budget plan, not an implemented budget policy yet.]]>
<![CDATA[Hard and Soft Border Paradigm for Border Governance in Indonesia: A General Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Ulfa, Nadlirotul]]>;
<![CDATA[Fimmastuti, Desiana Rizka]]>;
<![CDATA[Nia Rahmah, Anisa Nur]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.9396
<![CDATA[This study focuses on border governance paradigm for various relevant policies in Indonesia. By applying literature review method, it reveals that Indonesian border governance paradigm has shifted from hard to soft border paradigm. The change has significant impact on how managing border areas in the country. In fact, both paradigms have their own advantages and limitations. This study also shows that the preference between hard or soft boarder paradigm influences the decisions on how the government understand the complexity of the border.]]>
<![CDATA[Debate over Islamic Symbolism and Substantialism in the Formulation of Local Regulation in Tasikmalaya Municipality ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuliawati, Fitriyani]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurohman, Taufik]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.10758
<![CDATA[This study aims to reveal debate over the formulation of local regulation. Particularly, it seeks to know political dynamics at the grassroot level in policy-making. Theoretical assumption mentions that policy-making is not only a process of government technocracy, but it can also a debate over current discourse among citizens. The qualitative study discloses that the political debate over this discourse occurs due to contradictory perspectives on the aspirations of Shari’a law as a part of formal institutions in the state. The first camp argued that Islam should exist in the public as an effort to build an ideal society. Islam must be included as part of the state, at least in local regulation. In contrast, the second camp argued that in building the ideal society, state does not need to include Islam as part of the state in the regulation.]]>
<![CDATA[Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Abd. Hamid, Husen Wijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018): General Issue: Indonesian Politics ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v3i1.10604
<![CDATA[This study focuses on deliberative democracy practices in Caturtunggal village, specifically in the sub-village (dusun) of Seturan, Karangwuni, and Ambarukmo. The study assesses the quality of deliberation in these dusun by applying the three out of five indicators of deliberative democracy theory by Fishkin (2009), namely information, subtantantive balance, and equal consideration. This study deploys qualitative descriptive method and case-study approach with in-depth interview as the main data gathering technique. This deliberation has put Village Consultative Board (BPD) period of 2013-2019 as a mediator and to consider arguments and deliberative results. Based on the indicators which proposed by Fishkin, Seturan and Ambarukmo are categorized for having semi-ideal deliberation, meanwhile Karangwuni is categorized as not ideal. The study also finds elite capture practices in Seturan and Karangwuni, but they do not impact significantly. ]]>
